I remember everyone was complaining about AI-generated text before, and I've been seeing even more of it on Twitter recently, and now even the comments are AI too~~

Why are there so many AI-generated articles and AI comments?

To put it simply, the root issue lies in the design of the gameplay in the InfoFi sector.

##################################

Currently, the INFOFI platform often relies on "external expressions": publishing posts, liking, commenting, and sharing, which are then scored by algorithms, ultimately becoming the basis for the project's "influence" and "user activity."

But the problem lies here. As long as what you reward is "expression," there will always be someone who uses the most "efficient" way to pile up output, eventually turning into a battle between AIs, or even an illusion of robots shouting slogans all over a chain. It becomes difficult to distinguish between genuine human voices and echoes of incentives.

Against this backdrop, I have once again taken notice of an old platform—Layer3 @layer3xyz.

This time they launched a new feature called Signal, which seems to provide InfoFi with a completely different direction.

Signal does not rely on "words"; it looks at the "on-chain". If you truly interact, it can see it; if you truly exchange assets, deploy contracts, or participate in a new chain, it will record it.

Moreover, this system can comprehensively assess a project's "real participation rate" and "interaction quality", providing trend signals in advance before price surges, coin listings, and user explosions.

For example, a couple of days ago, I found that the interactive tasks of @Mantle_Official went live on Layer3, and the interaction was very popular, consistently ranking high on the Signal charts. However, its coin price $MNT is still following the market downtrend. So I bought in at 0.7 on August 2nd, and today, August 5th, it reached a high of 0.9~~

It seems that Signal's approach is indeed correct; compared to a bunch of AI bots that exchange posts for points, Layer3 clearly wants to "bring users back on-chain."

It no longer rewards "speaking up," but instead rewards you for actively interacting, trying out new protocols, and experiencing new ecosystems. This mechanism provides positive feedback for someone like me who enjoys hands-on involvement and hopes to discover possibilities in early projects.

INFOFI can’t get far just by talking.

No matter how advanced the algorithm is, it will eventually be found to have vulnerabilities by others, ultimately leading to a competition between AI and AI~~

However, a pure content poster really cannot compete with a genuine user who interacts on the chain, provides feedback, and forms habits.

I actually hope that the Layer3 model can become a kind of guidance.

Encourage project parties to do less flashy "airdrop announcements" and return to the product, the blockchain, and real interactions. Allocate rewards to those users who have genuinely spent time experiencing the project and left a footprint, rather than blindly distributing budgets to a bunch of accounts.

Moreover, the project is also looking for new ways. For example, the previous @MemeX_MRC20 has created a leaderboard on its own dapp, where only users who actually interact on their APP will receive rewards~~

##################################

Speaking of the current Layer3, it is no longer just a "task platform."
It has become the entry platform for Web3 user tasks and incentives, aggregating hundreds of popular on-chain tasks from various projects, integrating AI dynamic incentive mechanisms, a seamless abstract wallet, and the exclusive Cubes system, providing users with triple value of immediate earnings, long-term airdrop expectations, and medium to long-term Alpha signals.

It not only undertakes the early tasks of new chain projects but also attempts to piece together the four components of "new chain discovery + teaching guidance + user incentives + on-chain data" to become a true on-chain growth operating system.

Signal is its trend radar, capturing the ongoing heat through on-chain real behavior; CUBE is the on-chain badge left by users with each exploration. The entire Layer3, in essence, is an "on-chain growth engine."

It reminds me of what initially attracted me to Web3: not getting rich by shouting orders, but by actively participating and accumulating my own long-term potential through genuine interactions.

And those of us who are willing to take action from now on may be laying the groundwork for a crucial airdrop in the future, an important IDO, or even an on-chain credit identity.

Every click you make now, every on-chain interaction, may be accumulating a certain "non-fungible identity asset" for you.

This is where I see the most valuable aspect of Layer3.

Recently, Layer3 has established a Chinese community, with exclusive airdrop activities. Chinese users will receive additional benefits, so hurry up!
👉
#Layer3